Secular vs. Cyclical

Turnaround investors analyzing a downtrodden stock often face the following question: is the company’s problem cyclical or secular? Cyclical means that the company (or its whole industry) is facing temporary headwinds that are likely to swing back eventually to a more favorable direction. For example, auto makers and airlines tend to do poorly when the overall economy weakens but then rebound when the economy strengthens again.  Secular means that the negative forces affecting a company are long-term and often permanent in nature. For instance, many people believe that the changes to the retail sector brought about by Internet shopping are not likely to reverse and therefore should be considered secular.

The movie theater industry presents a very timely example of the cyclical versus secular dilemma. The stocks of the theater operators have been among the worst performers this year. While the broad market has gained nearly 13%, many stocks in the theater industry have declined by 20-50%.   Are the problems secular or cyclical? The right diagnosis could mean a huge difference in stock profit returns.

A major secular issue is the rising use of streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime that let viewers watch movies anytime and anywhere.  These services won’t be going away and if anything are likely to increase—making this a secular issue.

The theater industry is also in a cyclical downturn. Since 2009, the industry has had two cyclical downturns, each lasting a year or two, with ticket volume declines of roughly 7-10%. Attendance this year could be down 10% or more. These downturns have been largely attributed to a spate of weak offerings from the movie producers or a temporary shift in entertainment preferences. If the current weak attendance is mostly cyclical, it will likely reverse and produce impressive gains for investors as theater profits rebound.

Although we respect the longer-term secular issues, we think much of the recent problem is cyclical, largely driven by ebbs and flows in movie quality.  Through the end of the summer, this year’s movie line-up has been mostly lackluster. Nevertheless, viewers are still enthusiastic about seeing great movies at the theater. The “experience” of going out to see a movie has been drawing people to the theaters for more than a century, and we don’t see that changing soon. Moreover, theater operators are working hard to enhance the movie-going experience with luxury recliners, improved food offerings, alcoholic beverages and other amenities.

The slate of movies for the rest of this year looks promising with a new Star Wars film, three superhero movies and a new edition of the successful Planet of the Apes series. Two recent releases support our thesis that people still enjoy going to the movie theater. Stephen King’s It has been a surprise success, grossing $270 million worldwide in only three weeks to become the #1 horror movie of all time, and Beauty and the Beast grossed $1.3 billion.

Current cinema stock valuations reflect investors’ low expectations. Most of our selections trade for less than 8x next year’s expected EBITDA and yprovide generous dividend yields. Compare these to competitors Netflix, selling at 46x EBITDA, and Amazon, selling at 18x EBITDA, with neither offering a dividend. From our seat, the theaters look like more entertaining value. Learn more six movie theater stocks ripe for a turnaround.

More Turnaround Tips

Identify & Profit from Distressed Investing

Free Report: Turnaround Investing Mistakes

Turnaround Investing Blog

Turnaround Investing Blog

Turnaround Investing Philosophy: 32 Years Later, Some Things Never Change

Recently I was asked how my investing perspective changed over the 32 years of publishing The Turnaround Letter. It's a fascinating question because change is constant, and often beneficial (although that's not a given) in the business world. If change is the norm, can investing principles stay constant? I firmly believe that they can. Read More.

EV/EBITDA: What Is It & Why Are We Using It More?

In reading recent editions of The Turnaround Letter, you have probably noticed that we are increasingly using EV/EBITDA as a valuation measure, rather than the better-known price/earnings multiple.  We thought it might be useful to describe this measure and why we like it.

Read More.

Turnaround Letter Stock Pick Named Top Performer of 2017

 

stock market advicex

 

What Last Year's Top Stock Pickers Are Buying in 2018

 

This Forbes write-up follows up on the recent Top Stock Tips report--naming The Turnaround Letter's Crocs recommendation the top performer of 2017: With 90% gains, CROX beat out 100 other investment ideas included in the report; and the stock continues to have value investing appeal, according to Putnam.

 

George notes, "We see additional upside for the stock in 2018 as management's efforts continue to bear fruit, though the gains will likely be more muted than we saw in 2017."