Turnaround Investing Blog

George Putnam, one of the country's leading turnaround and distressed investing professionals, shares his timely insight on the economy and turnaround investing opportunities.

Finding The Value in Value Compression

Highlights

  • Value compression, or multiple compression, is simply when a stock’s valuation multiple, typically the price/earnings multiple, gets smaller.
  • Looking at the two components “Price” and “Earnings” separately can help turnaround investors understand how investors’ perceptions are changing.
  • A healthy company may experience value compression when it is overvalued: the stock price remains flat while its earnings continue to grow.
  • If a stock price declines fairly sharply while the earnings outlook remains flattish, the value compression could indicate a lack of confidence in the company’s revenue outlook.
  • When the earnings decline but the share price drops faster, which compresses the P/E multiple, it may indicate a lack of confidence in the longer term earnings outlook.
  • The opportunity for turnaround investors is to find situations where the earnings stabilize or improve and investor confidence recovers, which should lead to value expansion and a much higher stock price.

Discussion

Value compression, sometimes called “multiple compression,” is simply when a stock’s valuation multiple, usually the price/earnings ratio, gets smaller. While straightforward enough to identify, understanding what is behind the compression can help you understand how investors’ perceptions are changing. To do this, let’s split the P/E multiple into its two parts, Price and Earnings.

One type of value compression occurs when the stock price remains flat but the earnings continue to grow. This can mean that investors like the company but don’t like the valuation. Over time, these two trends will compress the P/E multiple. In a classic example, Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT) underwent this type of value compression over an 11-year period, from 2001-2011. The earnings (and outlook) remained healthy in 2001 but the stock was over-valued at the Price/Earnings multiple of 36 times (or, 36x). It was said at the time that Wal-Mart needed to “grow into its valuation.” While the stock traded narrowly during this period, between about 45 to 55, earnings continued to grow steadily from $1.40/share in 2001 to $4.54/share in 2012. This compressed the forward price/earnings multiple to 11x in 2011. Investors perceived (correctly) that Wal-Mart’s earnings growth outlook was healthy, but they were unwilling to pay a higher share price for that growth.

For turnaround investors, this type of stock can be a real challenge but rewarding if done patiently. Buy too early because it is “cheaper than it was,” and you may have little to show for your investment for a long time. But waiting for a meaningfully depressed valuation combined with a significant positive change (new strategy or new management, for example) and some tailwind from a rising stock market, can greatly improve your outcome. Wal-Mart had some help from both—so its shares have surged 60% and now trade at a forward P/E multiple of 18x.

With the market moving steadily higher over the past few years, this kind of value compression is increasingly rare, and its opposite (value expansion) is very common. However, at some point, when the market’s upward move stalls, we’ll see more healthy and steady companies needing to “grow into their valuation.”

Another type of value compression happens much more quickly—usually when a company falls out of favor with investors. The earnings may decline, but the collapse in the share price pushes the P/E multiple lower. A current example is AutoZone (NYSE: AZO), which traded at 800 last December but has declined 38% to around 500. However, its 2017 estimated earnings fell only about 4%, to $44/share, so its P/E multiple compressed from 17.4x to a current 11.4x. What changed: Recently weak results have investors worried that competition from Amazon, Wal-Mart and others might permanently weaken AutoZone’s revenue growth outlook.

Lower P/E multiples, like that of AutoZone’s, clearly appeal to turnaround investors, but require some catalysts or evidence that the earnings won’t turn downwards (producing a “value trap”).

LPL Financial (Nasdaq: LPLA) provides an example of another kind of value compression: temporary earnings weakness incorrectly extrapolated by investors. In December 2015, the shares traded at 45, with expected 2016 earnings of about $2.60/share, producing a P/E multiple of 17.3x. The company reported a very weak quarter just a few months later, driving the share price down by 56% to about 20. Earnings estimates for 2016 were cut by about 37%, to $1.65/share. The impact on the P/E multiple: it shrank to 12.1x. Investors believed that changes to the Department of Labor’s fiduciary standards, along with weaker advisor revenues and a secular move away from brokers, would permanently impair LPL’s earnings.

The opportunity in LPL Financial came from an overly compressed valuation, even on lower earnings estimates, as investors abandoned its shares. In this case, several improvements, including a new CEO, better expense control and higher revenues, along with some support from a higher stock market, led to restored confidence (indicated by a higher multiple) and restored fundamentals (indicated by stronger earnings), and thus a much higher share price. LPL Financial’s shares now trade at 45 again, up 125% from their 20 lows, with earnings estimates back at $2.60. The P/E multiple has recovered to 17.3x.

By separating the P/E multiple into its two components, Price and Earnings, a turnaround investor can greatly improve their understanding of the market’s perception of a candidate stock and similarly improve their turnaround stock selection. 

Read More Turnaround Investing Blog Entries

Identify & Profit from Distressed Investing

Free Report: Turnaround Investing Mistakes

Turnaround Investing Blog

Turnaround Investing Blog

Amazon = US GDP 1970

Amazon joined Apple in reaching a $1 trillion market capitalization. $1 trillion is about the same as the total value of New York City property and the total value of loans at JP Morgan, the nation’s largest bank in terms of assets. Jeff Bezos’ $160 billion stake would place him (personally) as the #33 largest company in the S&P 500 in terms of market cap, next to Coca-Cola, Disney and Netflix. We aren’t bold enough to predict whether the shares will continue upwards or if they are in a bubble reaching maximum inflation. Setting aside for a moment their investment prospects, let’s admire the truly remarkable milestone that these two companies have reached. Read More.

EV/EBITDA: What Is It & Why Are We Using It More?

In reading recent editions of The Turnaround Letter, you have probably noticed that we are increasingly using EV/EBITDA as a valuation measure, rather than the better-known price/earnings multiple.  We thought it might be useful to describe this measure and why we like it.

Read More.

Turnaround Letter Stock Pick Named Top Performer of 2017

 

stock market advicex

 

What Last Year's Top Stock Pickers Are Buying in 2018

 

This Forbes write-up follows up on the recent Top Stock Tips report--naming The Turnaround Letter's Crocs recommendation the top performer of 2017: With 90% gains, CROX beat out 100 other investment ideas included in the report; and the stock continues to have value investing appeal, according to Putnam.

 

George notes, "We see additional upside for the stock in 2018 as management's efforts continue to bear fruit, though the gains will likely be more muted than we saw in 2017."